Revisit GVfs goals for iteration 1
Originally created by @intrigeri on #15478 (Redmine)
As explained by segfault on #15218 (comment 30269):
- supporting via GVfs
the simplest possible kind of VeraCrypt volumesall kinds of volumes except ones using keyfiles is easy (or even done) - supporting via GVfs
all other kinds of VeraCryptunlocking using keyfiles is much more expensive than expected
One option would be to stop here and require users to use GNOME Disks to unlock non-trivial VeraCrypt devices.
Attachments
Parent Task: #15214 (closed)
Related issues
- Blocks #15218 (closed)