1. 22 Nov, 2011 1 commit
  2. 16 Oct, 2011 1 commit
  3. 15 Oct, 2011 1 commit
    • Tails developers's avatar
      Install plymouth. · c10b4f16
      Tails developers authored
      Fetch it from Debian unstable, because the packages split happened after Squeeze
      was released, and we only want the simplest possible non-DRM splash for now.
      c10b4f16
  4. 14 Oct, 2011 3 commits
  5. 07 Oct, 2011 1 commit
    • Tails developers's avatar
      Update kernel package pinning. · f3623609
      Tails developers authored
      The build is currently broken because linux-2.6 3.0.0-5 is waiting in NEW.
      Once this package is accepted into unstable, this change will be needed to
      fix the build.
      f3623609
  6. 05 Oct, 2011 1 commit
  7. 04 Oct, 2011 1 commit
  8. 01 Oct, 2011 1 commit
  9. 25 Sep, 2011 1 commit
    • Tails developers's avatar
      Install homemade aircrack-ng backport. · 3c927442
      Tails developers authored
      Debian unstable's one is currenty uninstallable on Squeeze, due to its
      dependency on a too recent version of libssl1.0.0.
      
      Hopefully Debian bug #588588 will get solved,
      aircrack-ng will migrate to testing,
      and we can install it from the official squeeze-backports.
      3c927442
  10. 22 Sep, 2011 2 commits
  11. 13 Sep, 2011 2 commits
  12. 12 Sep, 2011 1 commit
    • Tails developers's avatar
      Use testing's libssl1.0.0 instead of unstable's. · d4594d85
      Tails developers authored
      We previously fetched it from unstable, but now it depends on
      multiarch-support, which depends on unstable's libc6, which depends
      on... So in order to not completely mess up the time schedule for
      Tails 0.8 we defer that move to a later date.
      d4594d85
  13. 09 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  14. 01 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  15. 29 Aug, 2011 2 commits
  16. 28 Aug, 2011 2 commits
  17. 21 Aug, 2011 1 commit
  18. 17 Aug, 2011 4 commits
  19. 14 Aug, 2011 1 commit
  20. 27 Jul, 2011 2 commits
    • Tails developers's avatar
      Revert "Bring Broadcom STA modules back." · 16ece13b
      Tails developers authored
      This reverts commit d3ee66bb.
      
      I was confused, which is not surprising considering the shape of the Broadcom
      drivers landscape (http://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx#Drivers).
      
      The broadcom-sta (wl.ko) driver indeed brings support for some recent WiFi
      adapters, but it doesn't content itself with conflicting with the module that
      supports the same hardware (brcm80211, brcmsmac): it also conflicts with the ssb
      module that is itself needed by a few other modules such as b43, b44. In short,
      it seems like wl.ko breaks more hardware support than it brings.
      16ece13b
    • Tails developers's avatar
      Bring Broadcom STA modules back. · d3ee66bb
      Tails developers authored
      Background info:
        http://wiki.debian.org/brcm80211
        http://wiki.debian.org/wl
      
      User reports concur to indicate that the free brcm80211 / brcmsmac module are
      not on par with Broadcom's one, unfortunately.
      
      Installing from unstable for compatibility with newer kernels.
      
      Additionally, the package from unstable automatically blacklists the conflicting
      brcm80211 and brcmsmac modules. See Debian bugs #597786, #601009 and #611539 for
      details.
      d3ee66bb
  21. 20 Jul, 2011 1 commit
  22. 05 Jul, 2011 1 commit
  23. 28 Jun, 2011 1 commit
  24. 07 Jun, 2011 1 commit
  25. 29 May, 2011 1 commit
  26. 25 May, 2011 1 commit
  27. 22 May, 2011 1 commit
  28. 21 May, 2011 3 commits