1. 03 Apr, 2017 8 commits
  2. 28 Mar, 2017 2 commits
  3. 20 Mar, 2017 2 commits
  4. 19 Mar, 2017 3 commits
    • intrigeri's avatar
    • anonym's avatar
      Merge branch 'stable' into devel · c336187d
      anonym authored
      c336187d
    • anonym's avatar
      Test suite: try possible fix for #11508. · 112b34da
      anonym authored
      Yup, it seems that all along I've just missed that we could have
      IPv6Packet:s in `ip_packet`, and their source is accessed by
      `.ipv6_saddr`, not `ip_saddr` (that's for IPv4Packet). So, let's just
      try and see which one of the two each `ip_packet` has, because one of
      them must be there!
      
      Also, given that UDPPacket can be either IPv4 or IPv6 it seems safest
      to try to parse each packet as IPv6Packet first -- that way we keep
      looking at transport layer protocols for IPv4 only, and treat
      everything IPv6 as the same, which makes sense, since we should block
      all IPv6, so everything should be treated the same at all times.
      
      Refs: #11508
      112b34da
  5. 18 Mar, 2017 2 commits
    • anonym's avatar
      Merge branch 'stable' into devel · 857dac31
      anonym authored
      857dac31
    • anonym's avatar
      Test suite: refine debug info collection of #11508. · fdd50f83
      anonym authored
      I have seen yet another:
      
          NoMethodError: undefined method `ip_saddr' for nil:NilClass
      
      So we now know that `ip_packet` is not `nil`, it just doesn't have the
      `ip_saddr` method (and probably not the `ip_daddr` one either) some
      how (feels strange for an IP packet to not have a source or
      destination address...).
      
      Refs: #11508
      fdd50f83
  6. 15 Mar, 2017 5 commits
  7. 14 Mar, 2017 8 commits
  8. 13 Mar, 2017 10 commits