Currently translated at 37.5% (3 of 8 strings)

Translation: Tails/wiki/src/security/sandbox_escape_in_tor_browser.*.po
Translate-URL: http://translate.tails.boum.org/projects/tails/wikisrcsecuritysandbox_escape_in_tor_browserpo/tr/

Currently translated at 6.5% (4 of 62 strings)

Translation: Tails/wiki/src/news/version_3.14.1.*.po
Translate-URL: http://translate.tails.boum.org/projects/tails/wikisrcnewsversion_3141po/tr/

Currently translated at 2.6% (2 of 78 strings)

Translation: Tails/wiki/src/install/inc/steps/pc_boot_menu.inline.*.po
Translate-URL: http://translate.tails.boum.org/projects/tails/wikisrcinstallincstepspc_boot_menuinlinepo/es/

commit 049fe341 removed these a bit
over-enthusiastically IMO:

 - At this point, we have no clear design/solution for the case when
   one needs to keep the captive portal browser open or come back to it.
   The best we have currently is "keep this window somehow open".

 - The fingerprint impact of captive portal detection is left to be
   researched (and then we may have to discuss what we're comfortable with).

 - If/when Tor Launcher actively tries to discover if the user needs
   bridges/PTs, we'll need to decide how it plays vs. "I need to hide the fact
   I'm using Tor". We have no good answer so far.

So bring them back, and move the ones related to captive portals to the
dedicated page for now.

wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.ar.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.ca.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.id.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.pl.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.ru.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.sr_Latn.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.tr.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.zh.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.
wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.zh_TW.po: updating as wiki/src/doc/about/openpgp_keys/signing_key_revocation.de.po has changed.

It's older now and a bit less relevant.

After sajolida & I spent a few hours rethinking all this.

Currently translated at 2.1% (1 of 48 strings)

Translation: Tails/wiki/src/news/version_3.13.1.*.po
Translate-URL: http://translate.tails.boum.org/projects/tails/wikisrcnewsversion_3131po/ca/

Currently translated at 2.4% (1 of 41 strings)

Translation: Tails/wiki/src/news/version_3.11.*.po
Translate-URL: http://translate.tails.boum.org/projects/tails/wikisrcnewsversion_311po/ca/

We're waiting to see if it's getting fixed in Debian

I don't think that the people who are not reading
support/known_issues/#electrum-phishing before writing to help desk will
read our monthly report.