Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
/
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
tails
tails
Commits
f2fb7ce7
Commit
f2fb7ce7
authored
Dec 05, 2015
by
intrigeri
Browse files
SponsorS: add deliverable codename.
parent
c0d73a40
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorS/reports/2015_11.mdwn
View file @
f2fb7ce7
...
...
@@ -27,35 +27,37 @@ In November, XXX ISO images were automatically built on our Jenkins setup.
In November, **314 ISOs** were tested by our Jenkins instance.
With the 1.7 release, we were able to unify back the way the branches
based on our maintenance branch and the ones based on our development
branch were tested. (#10409)
We have deployed the feature that prints out in the test suite logs in
Jenkins a direct link to the collected artifacts of the failing step.
(#10445)
We found out that Sikuli was sometimes leaving PNG files in the Jenkins
workspaces, and we worked on a fix. (#10476)
We are being short again in disk space and need to anticipate that future
infrastructure features will require more, so we're sorting out what's the real
needs of our isotesters on this side, now that we have more data points.
(#10396)
We are also short on isotesters to really test every single automatically
built ISO image. So we're discussing if we need new hardware to cope with the
load, and if so, which kind. (#9264)
Meanwhile, our automated test suite will still be a bit more efficient
on testing branches that actually change Tails' code, while testing
only some subset for the branches that only change our website or
documentation. (#10492)
We spent a lot of the CI time gathering statistics about the test suite
runs in Jenkins in order to help the team writing the tests to identify
which scenarios were fragile, going forward to the release of the
notifications to contributors.
- B.2.4. Implement and deploy the best solution from this research
With the 1.7 release, we were able to unify back the way the branches
based on our maintenance branch and the ones based on our development
branch were tested. (#10409)
We have deployed the feature that prints out in the test suite logs in
Jenkins a direct link to the collected artifacts of the failing step.
(#10445)
We found out that Sikuli was sometimes leaving PNG files in the Jenkins
workspaces, and we worked on a fix. (#10476)
We are being short again in disk space and need to anticipate that future
infrastructure features will require more, so we're sorting out what's the real
needs of our isotesters on this side, now that we have more data points.
(#10396)
We are also short on isotesters to really test every single automatically
built ISO image. So we're discussing if we need new hardware to cope with the
load, and if so, which kind. (#9264)
Meanwhile, our automated test suite will still be a bit more efficient
on testing branches that actually change Tails' code, while testing
only some subset for the branches that only change our website or
documentation. (#10492)
We spent a lot of the CI time gathering statistics about the test suite
runs in Jenkins in order to help the team writing the tests to identify
which scenarios were fragile, going forward to the release of the
notifications to contributors.
## B.3. Extend the coverage of our test suite
...
...
Write
Preview
Supports
Markdown
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment