Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
What's new
7
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Open sidebar
tails
tails
Commits
c7d59476
Commit
c7d59476
authored
Mar 07, 2016
by
intrigeri
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Draft "Performance improvements on Jenkins".
parent
3fe4f483
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
19 additions
and
2 deletions
+19
-2
wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorS/reports/2016_02.mdwn
wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorS/reports/2016_02.mdwn
+19
-2
No files found.
wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorS/reports/2016_02.mdwn
View file @
c7d59476
...
...
@@ -142,8 +142,25 @@ XXX: anonym or intrigeri
- Performance improvements on Jenkins
XXX: intrigeri (platform optimization: [[!tails_ticket 11175]],
[[!tails_ticket 11113]])
We figured we could probably get some nice test suite performance
improvements, on our Jenkins environment, by optimizing the platform
itself.
After an initial round of benchmarking conducted in January, our
next action was to give our server more RAM in order to give us more
flexibility to evaluate different configuration options. This was
done in February, and then we went through a few optimization
cycles, identifying bottlenecks and addressing them until we were
satisfied ([[!tails_ticket 11175]], [[!tails_ticket 11113]],
<https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/hardware_for_automated_tests_take2/#benchmarks>).
As a result, we have improved our test suite runs throughput, in the
worst case scenario, from 3.3 to 8 runs per hour. This gives us room
to run more automated tests in that environment, and also shortens
the feedback loop for developers, since congestion is now less
likely to happen. We will keep an eye on metrics to confirm, in one
or two months, that real workloads indeed benefit from
these changes.
## B.4. Freezable APT repository
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment