Commit 384db7cf authored by intrigeri's avatar intrigeri

VPN blueprint: reference issues and update status

This blueprint reflects the state of our thoughts in 2012.
It's not obvious to me that this is still what we want.

refs #17843
parent d9ee6c70
......@@ -13,10 +13,12 @@ Similarly, we don't want to support VPNs as a replacement for Tor
since that provides terrible anonymity and hence isn't compatible with
Tails' goal.
# What we want
# What we might want
## Tails -> Tor -> VPN
Issue: [[!tails_ticket 5858]]
### Use cases
1. Access services that block Tor.
......@@ -41,6 +43,8 @@ it's irrelevant for Tor hidden services.
## Tails -> VPN -> Tor/I2P
Issue: [[!tails_ticket 17843]]
### Use cases
1. Make it possible to use Tails at airports and other pay-for-use
......@@ -53,7 +57,7 @@ it's irrelevant for Tor hidden services.
### Solution
Use cases 1 and 3 are worthwhile to support, and should be rather easy
to implement. See [[!tails_ticket 5858]].
to implement.
For all other uses of this setup (e.g. 2) we already promote bridges
instead. Now that obfsproxy is included, it should cover all
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment