- 12 Jan, 2017 4 commits
- 14 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
anonym authored
-
- 13 Dec, 2016 2 commits
- 12 Dec, 2016 2 commits
- 02 Dec, 2016 2 commits
- 17 Nov, 2016 2 commits
- 16 Nov, 2016 2 commits
- 10 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
anonym authored
Rationale: the translation work is not moving very fast these days, being quite polished for many languages, so we gain very little from frequently pulling it and preparing releases *only* for new translations (no new code). So, let's relieve the RM from this work for most releases, but still have a process in place for making sure that translations are pulled regularly.
-
- 09 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
- 03 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
anonym authored
Will-fix: #11860
-
- 30 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
anonym authored
Refs: #11851
-
- 28 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
intrigeri authored
Let's always encode, on the stable branch, the exact set of APT snapshots we want to use in next point-release. Previously we would pretend to thaw them by writing "latest" in APT_snapshots.d/*/serial, but then apt-mirror would special-case this situation: on an unreleased branch based on stable, it would consider that "latest" means "stick to previous release's tagged snapshot". Which worked fine at build time, except the part of our build system that creates the build manifest does not know about this convention, so the resulting build manifest would point to the latest APT snapshots we have, even though they were not really used during the build. And even if the build manifest pointed to the right place (i.e. the previous release's tagged APT snapshot), which is the only place where some of the needed packages are when tagging the next point-release's APT snapshot: tails-prepare-tagged-apt-snapshot-import does not know how to generate a configuration that pulls from there. So let's drop this special meaning of "latest", and make things simpler by actually hard-coding in Git the snapshots we really want to use. This implies the documentation change that makes sure that we're keeping these time-based APT snapshots long enough. refs: #11612
-
- 11 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
- 10 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
sajolida authored
-
- 02 Aug, 2016 3 commits
- 01 Aug, 2016 6 commits
-
-
intrigeri authored
-
intrigeri authored
-
intrigeri authored
Release process: take into account that most manual testers don't have access to our Gobby ⇒ we're using pads these days.
-
intrigeri authored
-
intrigeri authored
At this point we're still working on the $RELEASE_BRANCH. We'll be merging into master later, as documented.
-
intrigeri authored
It was too easy to miss that comment.
-
- 31 Jul, 2016 5 commits
-
-
intrigeri authored
-
intrigeri authored
The goal here is to point translators to up-to-date PO files, which can only work if we actually publish the updated ones.
-
intrigeri authored
I'm not sure if we've ever used it. In any case, nowadays we simply update the design doc on the corresponding topic branch, so there's no need to maintain documentation about the future on the live version of our website (master branch).
-
intrigeri authored
-
intrigeri authored
-
- 08 Jun, 2016 2 commits
- 06 Jun, 2016 2 commits
-
-
anonym authored
This way we only check the correctness of *new* UDF:s, and not old one that might be correct, but have signatures made with an expired key which otherwise report useless errors.
-
anonym authored
The old instructions will lead to *all* UDF:s (even unmodified ones) having their signature remade, which is unnecessary.
-